Contracts · MBE-tested
Curators of the Central College v. Rose, Collector of Revenue
323 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 611.
Curators of the Central College v. Rose, Collector of Revenue.
December 4, 1944.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Elliott H. Jones for appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal quesition. Chicago & Alton R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S. 67, 76; Phelps v. Board of Education, 300 U. S. 319, 322-23; Keefe v. Clark, 322 U. S. 393, 396.