Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al., 1966 — 385 U.S. 830 · caselaw · US
General
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
385 U.S. 830·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 273.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. et al. v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.
Francis M. Shea, Ralph J. Moore, Jr., Edward P. Russell, James W. Hoe-land and Peter S. Craig for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, James M. Maniré for the City of Memphis, and Edward J, Hickey, Jr., James Ij. Highsaw, Jr., William G. Mahoney and William. J. Hickey for Railway Labor Executives’ Association, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.