Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Town of Goshen, Respondent, v. Theodore Smith et al., Appellants, 1903 — 173 N.Y. 597 · caselaw · US
General
The Town of Goshen, Respondent, v. Theodore Smith et al., Appellants
173 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Town of Goshen, Respondent, v. Theodore Smith et al., Appellants.
Town of Goshen v. Smith, 61 App. Div. 461, affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1902;
decided January 6, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of .the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 6, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court.
Henry Bacon for appellants.
M. H. Kane for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett and Haight, JJ. Absent: Cullen and Werner, JJ.