General
Nicholas Espenscheid, as Administrator, etc., and in Person, as Heir-at-Law, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick Espenscheid et al., Respondents
151 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicholas Espenscheid, as Administrator, etc., and in Person, as Heir-at-Law, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick Espenscheid et al., Respondents.
(Submitted February 1, 1897;
decided February 9, 1897.)
Motion to prefer, under subdivision 5, section .791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground that an administrator is the sole plaintiff.
S. K. & B. C. Williams for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied on authority of Haux v. The Dry Dock Savings Institution (150 N. Y. 581), with ten dollars costs.