General
Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Appellant
135 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Kiefer, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Appellant.
(Submitted October 3, 1892;
decided October 18, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made January 5, 1892, which reversed so much of an order of Special Term as imposed terms upon plaintiff as a condition of extending the time within which a commissioner appointed by the court to execute an open commission might execute the same.
Sprague, Morey, Sprague & Brownell for appellant.
J. W. Bussell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.