Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brown v. Royall, Secretary of the Army, et al., 1950 — 339 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
General
Brown v. Royall, Secretary of the Army, et al.
339 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 691.
Brown v. Royall, Secretary of the Army, et al.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
Morton Singer, P. Bateman Ennis, Edward Holloway and Philip F. La Follette for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison and Samuel D. Slade for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.