Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SUSSMAN v. UNITED STATES, 1970 — 397 U.S. 43 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
SUSSMAN v. UNITED STATES
397 U.S. 43·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SUSSMAN v. UNITED STATES
No. 226.
Decided February 24, 1970
William J. Evans and L. Keith Simmer, Jr., for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit further consideration in light of Turner v. United States, 396 U. S. 398.