Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Professional Employees of I. T. T. Federal Laboratories et al. v. McCulloch et al., 1968 — 389 U.S. 1039 · caselaw · US
General
International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Professional Employees of I. T. T. Federal Laboratories et al. v. McCulloch et al.
389 U.S. 1039·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 772.
No. 773.
International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Professional Employees of I. T. T. Federal Laboratories et al. v. McCulloch et al.
Thomas L. Morrissey for petitioner in No. 772, and Merritt T. Viscardi for petitioners in No. 773.
Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondents National Labor Relations Board et al., and Sidney Reitman for respondent Local 400, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America, AFL-CIO, in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 382 F. 2d 366, 374.