General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. RAY & GILA VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee
68 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. RAY & GILA VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 7132.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 5, 1934.
Clifton Mathews, U. S. Atty., of Phœnix, Ariz., and Harold M. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Elmer B. Collins, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen.
William Wallace and Chadbourne, Stanchfield & Levy, all of New York City, Thomas C. Naim and Chalmers, Fennemore & Nairn, all of Phomix, Ariz., and Bussed G. Lucas, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellee.
Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Crrenit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — WILBUR, Circuit Judge.]
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Since this ease was argued, the "Supreme Court of the United States has decided the case of Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. v. United States (November 20, 1933) 290 U. S. 127, 54 S. Ct. 108, 78 L. Ed. —. On au-fjjority of that decision, the judgment is affirmed.