Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Walter Crystal, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Respondent, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 572 · caselaw · US
General
James Walter Crystal, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Respondent
141 N.Y. 572·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Walter Crystal, an Infant, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company, Respondent.
.(Argued January 19, 1894;
decided February 6, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made February 15, 1893, .which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order of the court nonsuiting plaintiff on trial at Circuit.
R. A. Pmmenter for appellant.
T. F. Fmnilton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on previous opinions of this court in same ¡case. (105 N. Y. 164; 124 id. 519.)
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.