General
Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.
348 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Black would hold this case for the decision in No. 466, Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York [probable jurisdiction noted, post, p. 935].
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 385.
Daniman et al. v. Board of Education of the City of New York et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Harold I. Cammer and Paxton Blair for appellants.
Daniel T. Scannell and Helen R. Cassidy for appellees.
Mr. Justice Black would hold this case for the decision in No. 466, Slochower v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York [probable jurisdiction noted, post, p. 935].