Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California, 1956 — 350 U.S. 979 · caselaw · US
General
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California
350 U.S. 979·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 613.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of Equalization of California.
Robert H. Gerdes and Richard H. Peterson for appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine and Irving H. Perluss, Assistant Attorneys General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.