Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LANDAU v. FORDING, CHIEF OF POLICE, et al., 1967 — 388 U.S. 456 · caselaw · US
General
LANDAU v. FORDING, CHIEF OF POLICE, et al.
388 U.S. 456·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas would grant the petition and reverse.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LANDAU v. FORDING, CHIEF OF POLICE, et al.
No. 1164.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.
Robert T. Anderson and Robert P. Berkman for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas would grant the petition and reverse.