Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States, 1943 — 319 U.S. 778 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States
319 U.S. 778·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 907 and 908.
Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. United States.
June 14, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for rehearing granted and order denying certiorari, ante, p. 758, vacated. Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted. Me. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Mr. E. Ennalls Berl, Albert C. Wall, Mason Trowbridge, and Edward J. O’Mara for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and Alvin J. Rockwell for the United States.