General
William O. Platt et al., as Trustees, Respondents, v. New York and Sea Beach Railway Company et al., August Meidling, Jr., Appellant
153 N.Y. 670·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William O. Platt et al., as Trustees, Respondents, v. New York and Sea Beach Railway Company et al., August Meidling, Jr., Appellant.
Platt v. N. Y. & Sea Beach R. Co., 9 App, Div. 87, 628, affirmed.
(Argued June 7, 1897 ;
decided June 22, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 6, 1896, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to correct or modify an order appointing a receiver and to vacate or modify a judgment of foreclosure.
Joseph Wamsley for appellant.
Frederic A. Ward for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gbay¿ J., absent.