Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atlantic Refining Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.; and Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al., 1959 — 358 U.S. 926 · caselaw · US
General
Atlantic Refining Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.; and Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.
358 U.S. 926·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 518.
No. 536.
Atlantic Refining Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.; and Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.
Charles B. Ellard and Bernard A. Foster, Jr. for the Atlantic Refining Co., Gentry Lee and Mr. Foster for the Cities Service Production Co., Gene M. Woodfin for the Continental Oil Co., and Robert O. Koch and Mr. Woodfin for the Tidewater Oil Co., petitioners in No. 518. William C. Braden, Jr., Harry S. Littman and Jack Werner for petitioner in No. 536. Kent H. Brown for the Public Service Commission of New York, Edward S. Kirby for the Public Service Electric & Gas Co., and David K. Kadane for the Long Island Lighting Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Reported below: 257 F. 2d 717.