General
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
389 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 500.
No. 501.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
John H. Haley, Jr., Milton Kramer and Clifton Hildebrand for petitioner in No. 500.
David Leo Uelmen and Mr. Kramer for petitioner in No. 501.
Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway, James R. Wolfe, Charles I. Hopkins, Jr., and Robert W. Yost for Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. et al., and Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Acting Assistant Attorney General Eardley and John C. Eldridge for Seward et al., respondents in No. 500. Messrs. Shea, Conway, Wolfe, Hopkins and James P. Reedy for respondent Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. in No. 501.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 127 U. S. App. D. C. 58, 380 F. 2d 605.