Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LEGGETT v. ALLEN, Assignee, 1884 — 110 U.S. 741 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
LEGGETT v. ALLEN, Assignee
110 U.S. 74128 L. Ed. 313·Supreme Court of the United States·1884
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LEGGETT v. ALLEN, Assignee.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
Submitted March 3d, 1884.
Decided March 10th, 1884.
Bankruptcy.
This court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment of a Circuit Court ren- ■ dered in a proceeding upon an appeal from an order of a District Court rejecting the claim of a supposed creditor against the estate of a bankrupt. Wiswall v. Campbell, 93 TJ. S. 347, affirmed.
Motion to dismiss.
Mr. A. J. Falls for appellee, moving.
Mr. Thorndike jSaunders for appellant, Opposing.
[MAJORITY — Me. Chief Justice Wáite]
Me. Chief Justice Wáite
delivered the'opinion of the court;
- This motion is granted on the authority of Wiswall v. Campbell, 93 U. S. 347, in which it was decided that this court has- no jurisdiction to review a judgment of the Circuit .Court, rendered in a proceeding upon an appeal from an order of the. District Court rejecting the claim of a supposed creditor against the estate of the bankrupt, and for the reason that a proceeding to prove a debt is part of the suit hi bankruptcy, and not an independent suit at law or in equity. Such being the nature of the proceeding, it is a matter of no consequence whether the appeal from the District Court to the Circuit Court was taken 'by the creditor or the assignee, for it has always been held that this court has no control over judgments or orders made by the Circuit Courts in mere bankruptcy proceedings. It is unnecessary to repeat here what was said in Wiswall v. Campbell. This case and that are in all material respects alike.
Dismissed.