Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Charles Hutchinson, Respondent, v. Mary F. Root, Appellant
154 N.Y. 746·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Hutchinson, Respondent, v. Mary F. Root, Appellant.
Reported below, 2 App. Div. 584.
(Argued October 18, 1897;
decided October 26, 1897.)
Renewed motion (see 153 N. Y. 329) to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 20, 1896, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
William li. Wilder and Frederie D. Philips for motion.
William G. Gammann opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.