General
Charles J. Herdt, Respondent, v. The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Appellant
142 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles J. Herdt, Respondent, v. The Rochester City and Brighton Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 9, 1894;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from j udgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made October 4, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed ah order denying a motion for a new trial.
Theodore Bacon for appellant.
Eugene Van Voorhis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.