Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. D. Garrett Company, Appellant, v. Daniel Sidney Appleton, Respondent, 1906 — 184 N.Y. 557 · caselaw · US
General
L. D. Garrett Company, Appellant, v. Daniel Sidney Appleton, Respondent
184 N.Y. 557·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
L. D. Garrett Company, Appellant, v. Daniel Sidney Appleton, Respondent.
Garrett Co. v. Appleton, 101 App. Div. 507, affirmed.
(Argued February 15, 1906;
decided March 6, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 24, 1905, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granting a new trial. •
Edgar J. Nathan and Michael H. Ga/rdozo for appellant.
Oharles E. Eydecker for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiff on the stipulation, with costs in all the courts, on opinion below.
Concur: Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J.