Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McGuire v. Hunter, Warden, 1944 — 322 U.S. 710 · caselaw · US
General
McGuire v. Hunter, Warden
322 U.S. 710·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 598.
McGuire v. Hunter, Warden.
May 8, 1944.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to add to the record the order of the District Court for the Western District of Michigan, dated April 7, 1944, are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted. In view of the new issues raised by the order of April 7, 1944, and with the consent of the Solicitor General, the judgments of the Circuit Court of Appeals and of the District Court are vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court, with leave to each party to present further evidence upon the material issues of the case. Bernard C. McGuire, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and W. Marvin Smith for respondent.