Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Alexander NYMAN, 1928 — 26 F.2d 559 · caselaw · US
IP
In the Matter of the Application of Alexander NYMAN
26 F.2d 559·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1928
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Alexander NYMAN.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted March 14, 1928.
Decided May 7, 1928.
No. 2055.
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents.
W. F. Nickel, of New York City, and Samuel Ostrolenk, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — MARTIN, Chief Justice.]
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The application for a patent, herein involved, relates to variable condensers for use in radio receiving sets. The controlling questions in the case are substantially identical with those decided in suit No. 2054, 58 App. D. C. —, 26 F.(2d) 558, relating to a similar application by the same party. Consistently with the conclusions reached by the court in that case, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, appealed from in this case, is affirmed.