Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Speiser v. Randall, Assessor of Contra Costa County, California; and Prince v. City and County of San Francisco, 1958 — 358 U.S. 860 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Speiser v. Randall, Assessor of Contra Costa County, California; and Prince v. City and County of San Francisco
358 U.S. 860·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 483,
No. 484,
October Term, 1957.
October Term, 1957.
Speiser v. Randall, Assessor of Contra Costa County, California; and Prince v. City and County of San Francisco,
[MAJORITY]
357 U. S. 513. Rehearing denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.