General
McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.
315 U.S. 785·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 967.
McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.
March 9, 1942.
Messrs. Samuel Kaufman, William T. Connor, and Nathan Bilder for appellant. Mr. Louis J. Cohen for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment was based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157; Utley v. St. Petersburg, 292 U. S. 106, 111-112.