General
California Lumbermen's Council et al. v. Federal Trade Commission
312 U.S. 709·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 775.
California Lumbermen’s Council et al. v. Federal Trade Commission.
March 31, 1941.
Mr, Morgan J. Doyle for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. Charles H. Weston, Thomas E. Harris, and W. T. Kelley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.