Contracts · MBE-tested
May v. United States; Garsson v. United States; and Garsson v. United States
338 U.S. 830·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 100.
No. 101.
No. 102.
May v. United States; Garsson v. United States; and Garsson v. United States.
Warren E. Magee and Daniel J. Andersen for petitioner in No. 100. Arthur Garfield Hays, Osmond K. Fraenkel, John Schulman, Charles J. Margiotti and Perry Howard for petitioner in No. 101. Charles J. Margiotti, Allen J. Krouse and Samuel Gold-stein for petitioner in No. 102. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.