Administrative
Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al.
349 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 637.
Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al.
Martin J. Pearl for petitioner.
Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., Richard R. Lyman and James L. Crawford for the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees et al.; and Wm. Hart Sibley for the Railway Express Agency, Inc., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.