Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, et al. v. MABRY et al., 1965 — 380 U.S. 251 · caselaw · US
Tax
DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, et al. v. MABRY et al.
380 U.S. 25113 L. Ed. 2d 818·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DAVIS, ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, et al. v. MABRY et al.
No. 774.
Decided March 8, 1965.
Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, James E. Barlow and Preston H. Dial, Jr., for appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. Carrington v. Rash, ante, p. 89.
Mr. Justice Harlan would reverse the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Carrington v. Rash, ante, at 97.