Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Theodore ABBEY v. UNITED STATES, 1928 — 27 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
Theodore ABBEY v. UNITED STATES
27 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Theodore ABBEY v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 13, 1928.
No. 5168.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; John M. Killits, Judge.
Walter S. Ruff, of Canton, Ohio, and Grabien & Pilliod, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.
A. E. Bernsteen, U. S. Atty., and Howell Leuek, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree of District Court affirmed in part, and reversed in part, and cause remanded for further proceedings.