Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Hanover Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, v. The Germania Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, Alexander Stoddart, Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
The Hanover Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, v. The Germania Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, Alexander Stoddart, Appellant
109 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Hanover Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, v. The Germania Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, Alexander Stoddart, Appellant.
(Argued April 24, 1888,
decided June 5, 1888.)
Appeal' from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made November 15, 1881, which modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term making allowances to the attorney for the defendants and to the receiver in the above-entitled action.
John S. Auerbach for appellant.
William G. Wilson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.