Contracts · MBE-tested
Delaware & Hudson Co. et al. v. Boston Railroad Holding Co. et al.; and Magenis et al. v. Boston Railroad Holding Co. et al.
343 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 567.
No. 593.
Delaware & Hudson Co. et al. v. Boston Railroad Holding Co. et al.; and Magenis et al. v. Boston Railroad Holding Co. et al.
Hugh D. McLellan for the Delaware & Hudson Co., petitioner in No. 567. William T. Griffin and Henry Cohen for petitioners in No. 593. John L. Hall and Richard Wait for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co., respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. The motion for leave to file brief of Dayton P. Haigney and associates as amici curiae or to obtain consideration of a brief as Co-Parties Petitioner is denied. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: No. 567, 328 Mass. 63, 102 N. E. 2d 67.