Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HAZELTINE RESEARCH CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Mertons SCHWAB, Doing Business as Radio Shack, Defendant-Appellant, 1926 — 14 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Corporations
HAZELTINE RESEARCH CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Mertons SCHWAB, Doing Business as Radio Shack, Defendant-Appellant
14 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HAZELTINE RESEARCH CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Harold Mertons SCHWAB, Doing Business as Radio Shack, Defendant-Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 20, 1926.)
No. 60.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Samuel Rubin, of New York City, for appellant.
William H. Davis and R. Morton Adams, both of New York City, for appellees.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed in open court.