Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James F. REINART, Administrator of Estate of Elmer Reinart, Appellant, v. Wilzena NASH, Appellee, 1929 — 30 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
James F. REINART, Administrator of Estate of Elmer Reinart, Appellant, v. Wilzena NASH, Appellee
30 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James F. REINART, Administrator of Estate of Elmer Reinart, Appellant, v. Wilzena NASH, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
March 20, 1929.
No. 4010.
Frank G. Turner, of Newark, N. J., and Charles C. Stalter, of Paterson, N. J., for appellant.
McCarter & English, of Newark, N. J. (Robert P. Schur, of New York City, and Conover English, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The motion on behalf of the appellee to dismiss the appeal in this case is granted, on the ground that said appeal was not taken within the time provided for and allowed by the statute.