Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. California
334 U.S. 825·Supreme Court of the United States·1948
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 12,
Original.
United States v. California.
Attorney General Clark, Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Arnold Raum, Stanley M. Silverberg, J. Edward Williams, Robert E. Mulroney and Robert M. Vaughan for the United States. Fred N. How-ser, Attorney General, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of California. Norman M. Littell and Katherine M. Littell for the Campo Band of Indians et al.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the Campo Band of Indians and others for leave
to intervene denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.