Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. Nolan, Appellant, v. The Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railroad Company, Respondent, 1894 — 144 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
John J. Nolan, Appellant, v. The Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railroad Company, Respondent
144 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John J. Nolan, Appellant, v. The Harlem Bridge, Morrisania and Fordham Railroad Company, Respondent.
(Argued November 28, 1894;
decided December 18, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made January 5, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
A. Cr. Vamderpoel for appellant.
Abel Grook for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.