Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Long Island Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent; Samuel Hanna, Appellant, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Long Island Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent; Samuel Hanna, Appellant
138 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. The Long Island Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Respondent; Samuel Hanna, Appellant.
(Submitted June 5, 1893;
decided June 20, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 23, 1893, which affirmed two orders of Special Term, one confirming a report of sale of defendant’s real property and the other denying a motion by Samuel Hanna to vacate said order and for a resale.
John A. Ga/rney for appellant.
S. W. Rosendale, Attorney-General, for the People, respondent.
John I. HiU for Long Island Savings Bank, respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.