General
BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX
393 U.S. 530·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX.
No. 883.
Decided February 24, 1969.
Thomas E. Towe for appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.