Corporations
The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Respondent, v. Joseph M. Emanuel, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
138 N.Y. 672·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Respondent, v. Joseph M. Emanuel, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 14, 1893;
decided June 30, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 24, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict directed, by the court.
Sol. Kohn for appellant.
Robert L. Redfield for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.