Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry Julian (Rebecca Julian, as Administratrix, Appellant), v. Mary A. Woolsey (Sarah J. Wood, as Ancillary Executrix, Respondent), 1895 — 147 N.Y. 722 · caselaw · US
General
Henry Julian (Rebecca Julian, as Administratrix, Appellant), v. Mary A. Woolsey (Sarah J. Wood, as Ancillary Executrix, Respondent)
147 N.Y. 722·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry Julian (Rebecca Julian, as Administratrix, Appellant), v. Mary A. Woolsey (Sarah J. Wood, as Ancillary Executrix, Respondent).
Reported below, 87 Hun, 826.
(Argued November 25, 1895;
decided December 10, 1895.)
Appeal' from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 15, 1895, which affirmed an order of the Special Term vacating a judgment entered by default against the defendant.
George O. Genet for appellant.
George J. Greenfield for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.