General
Julia Minerva Rogers et al., Respondents, v. John H. Smith et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others. John H. Derby et al., Respondents
177 N.Y. 588·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julia Minerva Rogers et al., Respondents, v. John H. Smith et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others. John H. Derby et al., Respondents.
Sogers v. Smith, 75 App. Div. 141. affirmed.
(Argued February 10, 1904;
decided March 1, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 12, 1902, affirming an interlocutory judgment of Special Term directing the sale of certain real estate to pay legacies.
J. Samford Potter, B. G. BLigley and Charles It. Parris for appellants.
Archibald S. Derby and Grenville M. Ingalsbe for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.