Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc., et al. v. National Parks & Conservation Assn. et al., 2011 — 563 U.S. 913 · caselaw · US
General
Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc., et al. v. National Parks & Conservation Assn. et al.
563 U.S. 913·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-548.
Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc., et al. v. National Parks & Conservation Assn. et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of Coachella Valley Economic Partnership, New Kaiser Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association, Pacific Legal Foundation, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles County, and Judge Craig Manson et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.