Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John McNaney, Individually and in Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Francis G. Hall , et al., as Executors of Samuel S. Hamlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
John McNaney, Individually and in Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Francis G. Hall , et al., as Executors of Samuel S. Hamlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents
159 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John McNaney, Individually and in Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. Francis G. Hall , et al., as Executors of Samuel S. Hamlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
McNaney v. Hall, 86 Hun, 415, affirmed.
(Argued April 25, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 18, 1895, affirming a judgment, in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
E. J. Baldwin for appellant.
Charles J. Bissell and John A. Reynolds for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Martin, J.. not sitting.