Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gwinner v. Heiner, formerly Collector of Internal Revenue, 1940 — 311 U.S. 714 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Gwinner v. Heiner, formerly Collector of Internal Revenue
311 U.S. 714·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Mr. Justice Douglas 'took no patrt in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 578.
Gwinner v. Heiner, formerly Collector of Internal Revenue.
December 23, 1940.
Messrs., William A. Seifert and William Wallace Booth for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Arnold Raum for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas 'took no patrt in the consideration or decision of this application.