Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William F. Bowen, Respondent, v. Henry M. True, Appellant, 1873 — 53 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
William F. Bowen, Respondent, v. Henry M. True, Appellant
53 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William F. Bowen, Respondent, v. Henry M. True, Appellant.
(Argued June 3, 1873;
decided September 30, 1873.)
Where a complaint sets forth two causes of action, upon one of which only defendant is liable to arrest, an order of arrest cannot be granted.
Íhis was an appeal from an order of General Term affirming a Special Term order, denying motion on the part of defendant to vacate an order of arrest. The complaint set forth two causes of action, upon one of which only defendant was liable to arrest. Held, that an order of arrest was improper in such action.
Justus Palmer for the appellant.
E. W. Packard for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse upon the ground that an. order of arrest could not be granted where complaint set forth two causes of action upon one of which only defendant was liable to arrest.
Ho opinion.
All concur.
Order reversed.