Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Ryan, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Hayes et al., Appellants, 1881 — 85 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Ryan, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Hayes et al., Appellants
85 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1881·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Ryan, Respondent, v. Thomas F. Hayes et al., Appellants.
(Argued May 9, 1881;
decided May 31, 1881.)
Decided on the-facts.
I. T. Williams for appellants.
John C. Connor, Jr., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Finch, J.]
Finch, J.
reads for modification of judgment by adding a direction that the bond in question be canceled, discharged and delivered up to the obligor, and as modified, affirmed.
Ail concur, except Folgeb, Oh. ,1., absent.
Ordered accordingly.