Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis v. Aderholdt et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 872 · caselaw · US
General
Lewis v. Aderholdt et al.
382 U.S. 872·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 141,
Misc.
Lewis v. Aderholdt et al.
Philip Shinberg for petitioner.
Chester H. Gray, Milton D. Korman and Hubert B. Pair for Aderholdt, and Thomas A. Flannery and Stephen A. Trimble for Washington Terminal Co., respondents.
Monroe H. Freedman for National Capital Area Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of National Capital Area Civil Liberties Union for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.
Rehearing Denied.