Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. F. Shultz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred W. Ritterbusch, County Treasurer, etc., et al., 1914 — 232 U.S. 719 · caselaw · US
General
J. F. Shultz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred W. Ritterbusch, County Treasurer, etc., et al.
232 U.S. 719·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 817.
J. F. Shultz, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred W. Ritterbusch, County Treasurer, etc., et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on summary docket, submitted February 24, 1914.
Mr. Milton Brown for the plaintiff in error. Mr. D. C. Westenhaver for the defendants in error.
Decided March 9, 1914.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (1) Consolidated Turnpike Company v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railroad Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600, and cases cited. (2) Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Company, 197 U. S. 430, 434, and cases cited.