Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
August Nitsch, Respondent, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Appellant, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 635 · caselaw · US
General
August Nitsch, Respondent, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Appellant
152 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
August Nitsch, Respondent, v. The American Central Insurance Company, Appellant.
Nitsch v. American Central Ins. Co., 83 Hun, 614, affirmed.
(Argued March 2, 1897;
decided March 16, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 15, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial on a case and exceptions.
I. N. Ames for appellant.
William Riley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.