Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank E. Parshley, Appellant, v. The Third Methodist Episcopal Church in the City of Brooklyn, Respondent, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 609 · caselaw · US
General
Frank E. Parshley, Appellant, v. The Third Methodist Episcopal Church in the City of Brooklyn, Respondent
139 N.Y. 609·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank E. Parshley, Appellant, v. The Third Methodist Episcopal Church in the City of Brooklyn, Respondent.
(Argued June 20, 1893;
decided October 3, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, made February 27, 1893, which denied a motion by plaintiff to require William J. Groo, attorney, to show his authority from defendant to appeal for it to said General Term, .to strike out the notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal.
Charles M. Stafford for appellant.
W. J. Groo for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.